Abstract
The evolution of microstructures of ZL201 sub-frame during casting was investigated. The processes of casting and cooling solidification were calculated by finite element and thermodynamic theory. The phase compositions were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), and the microstructures were detected by optical microscope (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results show that the simulated results of casting and cooling process are consistent with the experiment. When the pressure is 0.4 MPa, the filling rate of ZL201 sub-frame is 98% and the filling time is 10 s. After heat treatment, the θ phases (Al2Cu) dissolve into the Al matrix, and form homogeneous solid solution, which increases the grain size.
Science Press
Recently, the development of lightweight automobiles has received increasing attention. The rapid growth of car ownership and lightweight automobiles provides an effective measure to mitigate the associated energy and environmental problem
The ZL201 aluminum alloy has been widely used in the automobile body, chassis, and powertrai
In this work, the technological process of a ZL201 sub-frame casting (

Fig.1 Structure of a sub-frame
1. steering bracket; 2. mount bracket; 3. steering engine; 4. shock absor-ber; 5. spring; 6. tire; 7. steering knuckle; 8. stabilizer rod; 9. auxiliary frame; 10. stabilizer bar; 11. control arm
In order to calculate the microstructure simulation (CAFE) and the temperature field, the surface mesh and volume mesh were divided into nodes and grids with equilateral triangle elements as shown in

Fig.2 Grids of ZL201 sub-frame casting
Using Procast software, both casting and heat treatment processes of ZL201 sub-frame were simulated with the composition of alloying elements in
C=keC0 | (1-fs) |
(1) |
where ke is the effective solute solidification coefficient, C0 is the initial composition, fs is the frequency, and Cs is the solute segregation of the solid phase. In the microstructure simulation, the growth coefficient directly determines the growth rate of dendrites. The coefficient of growth can be expressed as
(2) |
. | (3) |
where m is the liquid phase slope, c0 is the alloy composition, Γ is the Gibbs-Thompson parameter, D is the liquid diffusion coefficient, k is the equilibrium solute partition coefficient, α is the first level growth coefficient, and β is the second level growth coefficient. The values of the thermophysical parameters and growth coefficients required for the microstructure simulation are listed in
The phase diagrams of the ZL201 aluminum alloy were calculated by thermodynamic theory. The simultaneous solution of the above equations was calculated to obtain a series of simultaneous equations. From these equations, the component with the lowest total Gibbs free energy was obtained. According to the results, the cooling and solidification curves and the phase diagrams of the ZL201 aluminum alloy system were drawn by thermodynamic calculatio
The ZL201 sub-frame casting was prepared by the low pressure casting under the pressure of 0.4 MPa, the casting temperature of 750 °C and the casting time of 10 s. The impu-rity elements include Fe, Si, and B, which are present in concentrations less than 0.01wt%. The metal mold was made from carbon steel C45. The cooling method was air cooling (FilmCo=10, T=25 °C). In T5 heat treatment process, the solu-tion temperature was 548 °C for 8 h, the quenching tempe-rature was about 60 °C, and the aging temperature was 170 °C for 7 h.
Sampling process and sites of sample sections for OM and XRD are shown in

Fig.3 Sketches of sub-frame casting (a) and sampling section (b)
(1) As shown in
(2) The casting samples were ground with 180#, 400#, 800#, and 1200# grit sandpaper.
(3) The ground samples were polished on the polishing machine at a speed of approximately 1000 r/min.
(4) The polished samples were cleaned with anhydrous ethanol (99.99mol%). The sample surface was corroded with hydrofluoric acid (10mol%) for 5~10 s. The observation position of the microstructure is shown in

Fig.4 Processes of casting (a) and cooling solidification (b) for ZL201 sub-frame
In the casting process,
OM microstructures of ZL201 sub-frame and their corresponding CAFE fields before and after heat treatment are shown in Fig.5. Samples are from position 1, 2 and 3 in



XRD patterns of ZL201 sub-frame casting are shown in Fig.7a. For the unheated treatment samples, the diffraction peaks and 2θ of Alfcc are (111)-38.2°, (200)-45.4°, (220)-65.1°, (311)-77.8° and (222)-82.7°. As shown in Fig.7b, the phase composition of ZL201 aluminum alloy is calculated by thermodynamic method. ZL201 is mainly composed of Alfcc, Al3Ti, θ and Al20Cu2Mn3 phases. The presence of other impurity elements is considered, such as Al7Cu2Fe impurity phase. Al-Cu-Mn ternary compound in the ZL201 alloy calcu-lated by thermodynamics is Al20Cu2Mn3, while the detection result of XRD pattern is Al20Cu4Mn9. According to the compa-rison between unheated and heated treatment, the Al-Cu-Mn phase disappears after heat treatment, the characteristic peak of the θ phase is reduced, and the characteristic peak strength of Al matrix increases. θ phase (Al2Cu) dissolves into the Al matrix in the ZL201, which forms homogeneous solid solution. As a result, the grain size increases. After ZL201 sub-frame is cooled, θ phase dissolves into Al matrix to form a supersaturated solid solution, which can improve the dynamic and toughness of the sub-frame casting.
1) The simulated results of casting and cooling process of ZL201 aluminum alloy by finite element and thermodynamic theory are consistent with the experiment. When the pressure is 0.4 MPa, the filling rate of ZL201 sub-frame is 98% and the filling time is 10 s.
2) After heat treatment, the θ phases (Al2Cu) dissolve into the Al matrix, and form homogeneous solid solution, which results in an increase in the grain size.
References
Kim H C, Wallington T J, Sullivan J L et al. Environmental Science & Technology [J], 2015, 49(16): 10 209 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu D. Automobile Technology[J], 1995, 1(7): 12 [Baidu Scholar]
Kang Q, Mao X Y, Lin J et al. Advanced Materials Research[J], 2013, 816-817: 255 [Baidu Scholar]
Wu Y L, Li C G, Sam F A et al. Metallurgical & Materials Transactions A[J], 1999, 30(4): 1017 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang P P, Zhao C H, Yi Z Y et al. Journal of Materials Sciences & Technology[J], 2019, 23(4): 14 [Baidu Scholar]
He Kai, Yan Jikang. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China[J], 2014, 24(11): 3632 [Baidu Scholar]
Mousavi M G, Cross C E, Grong. Science & Technology of Welding & Joining [J], 2013, 4(6): 381 [Baidu Scholar]
Wei H, Chen J S, Wang H P et al. Journal of Laser Applications[J], 2016, 28(2): 22 405 [Baidu Scholar]
Kawalla R, Coung N, Stolnikov A. Magnesium: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Magnesium Alloys and Their Applications[M]. Germany: Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2005 [Baidu Scholar]
Mirihanage W U, Mcfadden S, Browne D J. Materials Science Forum[J], 2010, 649: 355 [Baidu Scholar]
Jos E. Philosophical Magazine[J], 2011, 91(12): 1705 [Baidu Scholar]
Bozzoli F, Cattani L, Rainieri S et al. Experimental Thermal & Fluid Science[J], 2013, 59(5): 246 [Baidu Scholar]
Montgomery R B. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences[J], 1947, 4(6): 193 [Baidu Scholar]
Spowart J E, Miracle D B, Mullens H M. Journal of Non Crystalline Solids[J], 2004, 336(3): 202 [Baidu Scholar]
Zheng L, Wang Y X, Plawsky J L et al. Langmuir[J], 2002, [Baidu Scholar]
18(13): 5170 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang P. Journal of Northeastern University, Natural Science[J], 2009, 45(12): 12 [Baidu Scholar]